From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7062 invoked by alias); 5 Jul 2010 04:54:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 7053 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Jul 2010 04:54:38 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from exprod7og116.obsmtp.com (HELO exprod7og116.obsmtp.com) (64.18.2.219) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with SMTP; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 04:54:34 +0000 Received: from source ([209.36.247.244]) by exprod7ob116.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTDFlhx3hQtGwvRlv7iAZhs2NuNfWLCYo@postini.com; Sun, 04 Jul 2010 21:54:34 PDT Received: from milexhtca2.ds.jdsu.net ([10.75.2.122]) by Outbound1.jdsu.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sun, 4 Jul 2010 21:52:44 -0700 Received: from MILEXCH2.ds.jdsu.net ([fe80::a071:342f:fdf0:bb53]) by milexhtca2.ds.jdsu.net ([::1]) with mapi; Sun, 4 Jul 2010 21:52:43 -0700 From: Jon Zhou To: "gdb@sourceware.org" Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2010 04:54:00 -0000 Subject: support biarch gcore? Message-ID: <4A6A2125329CFD4D8CC40C9E8ABCAB9F24987E52BB@MILEXCH2.ds.jdsu.net> References: <4A25DE879BC24E8DAEAEBD722E363025@igor> In-Reply-To: <4A25DE879BC24E8DAEAEBD722E363025@igor> x-cr-hashedpuzzle: BW3u BlK/ Bz7e CDcI CPcc EzVe E714 E/rC FiCj GJoC GObn HhHS HqxT JbMF K1kn L0Ee;1;ZwBkAGIAQABzAG8AdQByAGMAZQB3AGEAcgBlAC4AbwByAGcA;Sosha1_v1;7;{2F4D18C0-A90F-494F-B55A-8EA9DCE37169};agBvAG4ALgB6AGgAbwB1AEAAagBkAHMAdQAuAGMAbwBtAA==;Mon, 05 Jul 2010 04:52:37 GMT;cwB1AHAAcABvAHIAdAAgAGIAaQBhAHIAYwBoACAAZwBjAG8AcgBlAD8A x-cr-puzzleid: {2F4D18C0-A90F-494F-B55A-8EA9DCE37169} Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-07/txt/msg00008.txt.bz2 Hi there Regarding this case, does the current release solve it ? I just tried the p= atch but looks it doesn't work Thanks jon http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2009-03/msg00010.html Re: Problem viewing gcore of 32 bit binary on 64 bit SLES 10.1, gdb 6.6 From: Jan Kratochvil =20 To: Shane G =20 Cc: gdb at sourceware dot org=20 Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 00:10:28 +0100=20 Subject: Re: Problem viewing gcore of 32 bit binary on 64 bit SLES 10.1, gd= b 6.6=20 References: <985ad4e70903021500u594a4c4w30eff9ae287f5e8d@mail.gmail.com>=20 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----- On Tue, 03 Mar 2009 00:00:57 +0100, Shane G wrote: > I'm unable to view any usable information from a gcore that I've run > against a 32 bit binary running on a 64 bit version of SLES 10.1. from your description IMO the core file is primarily generated wrong by gco= re. If you somewhere get a correct 32bit core file expecting gdb-x86_64 probably reads it fine on your system. > This GDB was configured as "x86_64-suse-linux"... At least in http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/dgollub/openSUSE_Factory/sr= c/gdb-6.8-14.80.src.rpm I see no gcore biarch patch and FSF GDB does not support biarch gcore (in t= his case i386-on-x86_64). You may port there the patch: http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewvc/rpms/gdb/devel/gdb-6.5-gcore-i386-on-am= d64.patch?revision=3D1.6 Regards, Jan