From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-37848-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 19736 invoked by alias); 16 Aug 2010 16:01:09 -0000
Received: (qmail 19673 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Aug 2010 16:01:08 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_20,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 16:01:02 +0000
Received: (qmail 32004 invoked from network); 16 Aug 2010 16:01:00 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO macbook-2.local) (stan@127.0.0.2)  by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 16 Aug 2010 16:01:00 -0000
Message-ID: <4C6960B3.30101@codesourcery.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 16:01:00 -0000
From: Stan Shebs <stan@codesourcery.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Macintosh/20100228)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
CC: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>, gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: GDB 7.2 release date
References: <20100728175011.GB7907@adacore.com> <201007291514.01249.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20100816151513.GA13566@adacore.com> <201008161620.53864.pedro@codesourcery.com>
In-Reply-To: <201008161620.53864.pedro@codesourcery.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-08/txt/msg00096.txt.bz2

Pedro Alves wrote:
> On Monday 16 August 2010 16:15:13, Joel Brobecker wrote:
>   
>> (apologies to everyone for dropping the ball a bit on the release)
>>
>>     
>>> The latter, I'm afraid.  Out of memory, for example, the observer
>>> mode, and its commands and packets aren't mentioned in NEWS.  I'll
>>> start by mentioning this on the wiki.
>>>       
>> I admit I scanned the emails for the past week a little fast. But I do
>> not remember seeing any progress on this topic. Is there someone who
>> is supposed to look at that, or is this going to be on my plate?
>>     
>
> I was kind of hoping that patches would have appeared, [...]
Is that shorthand for "I was hoping that Stan would do his job"?  :-)

I can certainly take care of the observer mode part at least.

Stan