From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21951 invoked by alias); 29 Nov 2011 04:10:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 21927 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Nov 2011 04:10:17 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from elasmtp-mealy.atl.sa.earthlink.net (HELO elasmtp-mealy.atl.sa.earthlink.net) (209.86.89.69) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 04:10:04 +0000 Received: from [70.170.59.51] (helo=macbook2.local) by elasmtp-mealy.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1RVF0z-00067e-O0 for gdb@sourceware.org; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 23:09:53 -0500 Message-ID: <4ED45AF9.9000009@earthlink.net> Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 04:10:00 -0000 From: Stan Shebs User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Two quick questions References: <87wrak63cd.fsf@gmail.com> <20111128153809.GB17887@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: ae6f8838ff913eba0cc1426638a40ef67e972de0d01da9409b3bf4511d3a618ff93d966f063d0660350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg00126.txt.bz2 On 11/28/11 7:25 PM, Andrey Smirnov wrote: > I was asking exactly because I wanted avoid generated unnecessary > "junk" in the patches just because I idly hit the tab on some line in > the code an my editor re-indented it differently(for example with all > spaces, which is default for me now) while writing a patch. It is just > that I've already seen one such occurrence in one of my patches and I > would like to avoid having them in further ones. So, just to be clear, > I'm neither planning nor thinking about planning to re-indent the > code. Andrey Smirnov 99+% of the code has been indented with Emacs using its old standard of 8-space tabs. So if you use that setting, the surprises will be fewest in number. :-) Stan