From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16523 invoked by alias); 27 Jan 2012 20:30:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 16514 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Jan 2012 20:30:13 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SARE_SUB_OBFU_Z,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 20:29:55 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q0RKToW9029718 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 27 Jan 2012 15:29:50 -0500 Received: from [10.11.11.228] (vpn-11-228.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.11.228]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q0RKTmV4028534; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 15:29:49 -0500 Message-ID: <4F23093C.5010902@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 20:30:00 -0000 From: Marek Polacek MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Frysinger CC: gdb@sourceware.org, Jan Kratochvil , Jim Meyering Subject: Re: xz-compressed release tarballs? References: <87mx9a1ag4.fsf@rho.meyering.net> <20120126203148.GA30390@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20120127092623.GA14113@host2.jankratochvil.net> <201201271528.33117.vapier@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <201201271528.33117.vapier@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-01/txt/msg00101.txt.bz2 On 01/27/2012 09:28 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Friday 27 January 2012 04:26:24 Jan Kratochvil wrote: >> I am fine with providing the snapshots only as .tar.xz but that may bring >> more disagreements. The snapshots may not be so world visible like the >> releases. Are there concerns about snapshots only in the .tar.xz format? > > fine by me :) FWIW, I'm all for this idea. Marek