From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10641 invoked by alias); 28 Jan 2012 01:33:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 10633 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Jan 2012 01:33:35 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,TW_DB X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-pw0-f41.google.com (HELO mail-pw0-f41.google.com) (209.85.160.41) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 01:33:22 +0000 Received: by pbaa12 with SMTP id a12so2295524pba.0 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 17:33:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.68.74.164 with SMTP id u4mr19026922pbv.85.1327714401280; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 17:33:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.102] ([115.195.154.114]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a5sm24350492pbh.15.2012.01.27.17.33.15 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 27 Jan 2012 17:33:19 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F23517A.6010905@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 01:33:00 -0000 From: asmwarrior User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joel Brobecker CC: gdb@sourceware.org, Xun Xun Subject: Re: [mingw] gdb eat a lot of memory and slowly when start an inferior References: <4F228353.3010707@gmail.com> <20120127110110.GO31397@adacore.com> <4F22AFF5.1000609@gmail.com> <20120127153803.GP31397@adacore.com> <20120127190847.GQ31397@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: <20120127190847.GQ31397@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-01/txt/msg00104.txt.bz2 On 2012-1-28 3:08, Joel Brobecker wrote: >> Can you try the attached patch? This should restore the only effective >> change I made for non-Ada units. > Never mind. I think Jan found the source of the problem: > http://www.sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2012-01/msg00953.html > Hi, Joel. Thanks for the info. Now I just test the latest gdb cvs code, and I can confirm that this issue is fixed. Thank you! asmwarrior ollydbg from codeblocks' forum