From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9973 invoked by alias); 22 Jun 2012 09:38:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 9904 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Jun 2012 09:38:21 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 09:38:08 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q5M9c3la011129 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 22 Jun 2012 05:38:03 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q5M9c15n018343; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 05:38:02 -0400 Message-ID: <4FE43CF9.1010801@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 09:38:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vladimir Prus CC: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: gdbserver and following children References: <4FE42EA8.7000101@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <4FE42EA8.7000101@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-06/txt/msg00079.txt.bz2 Hi Vladimir, On 06/22/2012 09:36 AM, Vladimir Prus wrote: > I cannot quite figure from the documentation whether it is possible, in multi-process mode with gdbserver, to > automatically attach to all children? It's not possible. > > I see that http://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/MultiProcess mentions this functionality is living on a branch and not > yet ready, but than the page also talks about 7.2. Of course, I can try with CVS HEAD, but it would be hard to > separate missing functionality in GDB from missing functionality in my head. Here you'll find a more in depth comparison of gdbserver vs native gdb supported features: http://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/LocalRemoteFeatureParity -- Pedro Alves