From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18869 invoked by alias); 23 Sep 2004 09:33:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18861 invoked from network); 23 Sep 2004 09:33:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.hispeed.ch) (62.2.95.247) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 23 Sep 2004 09:33:57 -0000 Received: from indel.ch (217-162-27-127.dclient.hispeed.ch [217.162.27.127]) by smtp.hispeed.ch (8.12.6/8.12.6/tornado-1.0) with SMTP id i8N9Xua4013995 for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 11:33:56 +0200 Received: from fabi.indel.ch [192.168.1.19] by indel.ch [127.0.0.1] with SMTP (MDaemon.v2.7.SP5.R) for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 11:32:17 +0200 Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.1.20040923113200.01d1f670@NT_SERVER> X-Sender: cenedese@NT_SERVER (Unverified) Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 09:33:00 -0000 To: gdb@sources.redhat.com From: Fabian Cenedese Subject: Re: Unimplemented MI commands In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.1.20040923093618.01d3f068@NT_SERVER> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: gdb@sources.redhat.com X-Return-Path: cenedese@indel.ch X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg00196.txt.bz2 >I've seen in mi/mi-cmds.c that about half of the mi commands are not >implemented yet. Are there plans for them? Or do I need to use the >normal console interface for these commands? I'm especially >interested in the -symbol-* functions where only one is available now. Replying to myself. I've found this mail with a patch, why wasn't that included then? http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2002-09/msg00302.html Thanks bye Fabi