From: Fabian Cenedese <Cenedese@indel.ch>
To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: View registers from stack frames
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2004 15:00:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5.2.0.9.1.20041005162110.01d03818@NT_SERVER> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041005140227.GA13586@nevyn.them.org>
>> >>With the stack commands (frame, up, down) I can select a different
>> >>stack frame. Local variables and arguments (even with same name)
>> >>have different values, depending on the stack frame number. But it
>> >>seems that registers aren't corrected for previous stack frames. Is
>> >>this correct? e.g. the PC and LR should change their value on every
>> >>frame, and the PC was the last LR. But "info reg" always shows the
>> >>same values. Is there any way to get the previous frame's registers?
>> >>When I do "info frame x" I get something like "saved pc 0x..." so at
>> >>least this information is available, why isn't this put into the register
>> >>overview? And what about the other SPRs and GPRs?
>> >
>> >You've just described the expected and correct behavior. That makes it sound like an architecture specific bug. Which architecture system is this on, and can you post a transcript.
>>
>> I'm using a self built gdb-6.1.1 for PPC-targets and cygwin. The
>> communication with the target is over a stub-server to a PPC-board.
>
>For PPC, try 6.2 instead.
>
>As Andrew already explained, this is what is supposed to happen. It
>did not used to work but was fixed by the new frame architecture.
Ok, I will try 6.2 then.
Thanks
bye Fabi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-05 14:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-05 12:48 Fabian Cenedese
2004-10-05 13:30 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-10-05 14:02 ` Fabian Cenedese
2004-10-05 14:03 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-10-05 15:00 ` Fabian Cenedese [this message]
2004-10-05 17:57 ` Fabian Cenedese
2004-10-06 1:57 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-10-06 7:18 ` Fabian Cenedese
2004-10-06 16:41 ` Kevin Buettner
2004-10-07 9:04 ` Fabian Cenedese
2004-10-11 19:21 ` Kevin Buettner
2004-10-07 17:50 Xinan Tang
[not found] <5.2.0.9.1.20041007134711.01d12d90@NT_SERVER>
[not found] ` <20041007085738.45b5b55a@saguaro>
2004-10-08 10:14 ` Fabian Cenedese
2004-10-11 19:16 ` Kevin Buettner
2004-10-12 14:03 ` Fabian Cenedese
2004-10-16 15:11 ` Kevin Buettner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5.2.0.9.1.20041005162110.01d03818@NT_SERVER \
--to=cenedese@indel.ch \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).