From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28916 invoked by alias); 17 Oct 2012 01:16:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 28907 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Oct 2012 01:16:31 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Oct 2012 01:16:27 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-exc-10.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.58]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1TOIFF-0000DL-Ce from Yao_Qi@mentor.com ; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 18:16:25 -0700 Received: from SVR-ORW-FEM-03.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.97.39]) by SVR-ORW-EXC-10.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 16 Oct 2012 18:16:24 -0700 Received: from qiyao.dyndns.org (147.34.91.1) by svr-orw-fem-03.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.97.39) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.289.1; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 18:15:43 -0700 Message-ID: <507E06F1.9090700@codesourcery.com> Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 01:16:00 -0000 From: Yao Qi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120911 Thunderbird/15.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pedro Alves CC: "Prus, Vladimir" , "Kozlov, Dmitry" , "gdb@sourceware.org" , "Gustavo, Luis" , "Shebs, Stan" , Marc Khouzam Subject: Re: question on trace-stop-notes implementation References: <506C3395.8010701@mentor.com>,<5071367F.4030203@codesourcery.com> <8815DDFC-F8BA-4C5C-BC00-7187CB58356C@mentor.com> <507224D8.5000902@codesourcery.com> <507D8D6F.5090108@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <507D8D6F.5090108@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-10/txt/msg00075.txt.bz2 On 10/17/2012 12:38 AM, Pedro Alves wrote: > On 10/08/2012 01:56 AM, Yao Qi wrote: >> On 10/08/2012 01:26 AM, Prus, Vladimir wrote: >>> Does that work if we connect to a target that has tracing in progress, with some end note already set? >> >> Yes, I think so. Command parameter change notification is emitted whenever command parameter is changed, it has nothing to do with other factors. >> The session below is about what you want, IIUC, > > I don't think that's the same issue. If you connect to a target that already had > tracing on progress, you'd want to read the stop note that was already set on the > target. There's no way currently. With RSP notifications, and MI change notifications > in place, you'd still miss a way to sync the stop note on initial connection. > I misunderstood "that work" in the original question. -- Yao