From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 586 invoked by alias); 17 Oct 2014 08:08:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 571 invoked by uid 89); 17 Oct 2014 08:08:24 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 08:08:21 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s9H88I4s019394 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 17 Oct 2014 04:08:18 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s9H88GJg022240; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 04:08:16 -0400 Message-ID: <5440CE6F.8070902@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 08:08:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?w5ZtZXIgU2luYW4gQcSfYWNhbg==?= , Stan Shebs CC: gdb Subject: Re: GDB C API -- does such a thing exist? References: <5440588D.8060503@earthlink.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SW-Source: 2014-10/txt/msg00054.txt.bz2 On 10/17/2014 07:44 AM, Ömer Sinan Ağacan wrote: > Thanks for all the answers. > > 2014-10-17 2:45 GMT+03:00 Stan Shebs : >> MI is really the safe way to go. > > A lot of people suggested this so I guess that's right. Where can I > find specification of it? > > One thing that I'm confused about this MI thing is that even IDEs > don't use it, as far as I can see. See https://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/GDB%20Front%20Ends . > For example, I just checked CLion > and it's just running GDB prompt and talking with GDB using it. How did you check? Is CLion's source code somewhere? > So I had a bad impression about it. I'm hoping to be wrong. Thanks, Pedro Alves