From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 57956 invoked by alias); 13 Mar 2015 16:05:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 57911 invoked by uid 89); 13 Mar 2015 16:05:17 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mail.emea.novell.com Received: from mail.emea.novell.com (HELO mail.emea.novell.com) (130.57.118.101) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 16:05:16 +0000 Received: from EMEA1-MTA by mail.emea.novell.com with Novell_GroupWise; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 16:05:12 +0000 Message-Id: <550318C90200007800069E5B@mail.emea.novell.com> Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 16:05:00 -0000 From: "Jan Beulich" To: "H.J. Lu" Cc: "Binutils" ,"GDB" Subject: Re: RFC: Add support for SHF_COMPRESSED References: In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-SW-Source: 2015-03/txt/msg00027.txt.bz2 >>> On 13.03.15 at 16:31, wrote: > I am working on SHF_COMPRESSED support: >=20 > http://www.sco.com/developers/gabi/latest/ch4.sheader.html=20 >=20 > We already have .zdebug* sections, which aren't compatible > with SHF_COMPRESSED scheme due to missing compression > header. What section names should we use for SHF_COMPRESSED > debug sections. Using .debug* or .zdebug* will break existing tools. > I am thinking .zlibdebug* or ..Zdebug*. Any suggestions? Why would they need to have different names anyway? They're distinguishable by the flag. Jan