From: Pierre-Marie de Rodat <derodat@adacore.com>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>,
Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Sivanupandi Pitchumani <Pitchumani.Sivanupandi@atmel.com>,
"gdb@sourceware.org" <gdb@sourceware.org>,
Andrew Burgess <andrew.burgess@embecosm.com>,
"tom@tromey.com" <tom@tromey.com>
Subject: Re: dynamic array's upper bound evaluated as address for AVR target
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 14:19:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <562A41EA.6020304@adacore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <561E5A7C.1040902@adacore.com>
On 10/14/2015 09:37 AM, Pierre-Marie de Rodat wrote:
> And to me as well: thank you Ulrich for this crystal clear explanation.
> :-) I will give it a try next week, then.
Quick update: I started to dig into this. I still have a hard time
wrapping the current implementation in my mind[1] and thinking about
what we should do exactly:
* Have different types for expressions and location lists (hence
potentially renaming existing code): looks like a big commit!
* Introduce another entry point to evaluate dynamic properties as
expressions. Looks like a small change but a weaker design: how to
evaluate depends a property depends on the property, not the evaluation
context, so it would be great to keep types distinct.
I cannot make any commitment on a schedule to implement this, though.
[1] Especially considering that dynamic properties handle only locations
that resolve to an inferior address. Location resolution for variables
donât rely on this mechanism, which is some kind of inconsistency. On
the other hand, dynamic properties are DWARF-specificâ¦
--
Pierre-Marie de Rodat
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-23 14:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-13 9:08 Sivanupandi, Pitchumani
2015-10-13 14:44 ` Pierre-Marie de Rodat
2015-10-14 6:33 ` Sivanupandi, Pitchumani
2015-10-14 6:54 ` Pierre-Marie de Rodat
2015-10-14 7:54 ` Sivanupandi, Pitchumani
2015-10-14 8:26 ` Pierre-Marie de Rodat
2015-10-14 9:41 ` Ulrich Weigand
2015-10-14 12:26 ` Joel Brobecker
2015-10-14 13:37 ` Pierre-Marie de Rodat
2015-10-23 14:19 ` Pierre-Marie de Rodat [this message]
2015-10-23 16:47 ` Ulrich Weigand
2015-10-14 10:15 ` Sivanupandi, Pitchumani
2015-10-14 13:39 ` Pierre-Marie de Rodat
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=562A41EA.6020304@adacore.com \
--to=derodat@adacore.com \
--cc=Pitchumani.Sivanupandi@atmel.com \
--cc=andrew.burgess@embecosm.com \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
--cc=tom@tromey.com \
--cc=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).