From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 41065 invoked by alias); 19 Nov 2015 11:24:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 41044 invoked by uid 89); 19 Nov 2015 11:24:11 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 11:24:10 +0000 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0E2342E5C3; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 11:24:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id tAJBO7Ei002710; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 06:24:08 -0500 Message-ID: <564DB157.3080904@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 11:24:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Juha Aaltonen , gdb-mailing list Subject: Re: Remote response to xmlRegisters? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg00027.txt.bz2 We've already discussed this on IRC, but for the benefit of others finding this in the archives ... On 11/18/2015 09:06 AM, Juha Aaltonen wrote: > What should a remote respond to 'qSupported' that has > 'xmlRegisters=i386' when remote wants to give its target description? xmlRegisters=i386 merely serves as indication that gdb understands i386 target descriptions. That was something added in order to allow stubs/gdbserver to be backwards compatible with older gdb's that _didn't_ understand i386 target descriptions. > I obviously didn't respond right, because gdb never asked for the > target description. What you need to do is to include 'qXfer:features:read+' in the stub's qSupported reply, and then implement the qXfer:features:read packet. Thanks, Pedro Alves