Re: Proposal: Add review tags to patch review workflow.

[Bruno Larsen <blarsen@redhat.com>]

On 26/09/2022 23:32, John Baldwin wrote:
> On 9/26/22 6:55 AM, Simon Marchi via Gdb wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2022-09-21 07:04, Bruno Larsen via Gdb wrote:
>>> TL;DR: I want to introduce the usage of 3 new review tags to the GDB 
>>> patch review workflow. They are: Reviewed-by, Approved-by and 
>>> Tested-by.
>>
>> Hi Bruno,
>>
>> I completely agree with the proposal.  I really like the fact that it
>> makes communication less ambiguous.  Following some process (or changing
>> the process) can feel a bit heavy for long-timers, but I think it makes
>> things much clearer for newcomers.
>>
>> Assuming we will go through with this proposal, it will need to be
>> documented on the wiki so we can easily refer people to the procedure.
>> Probably the ContributionChecklist page?
>>
>>    https://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/ContributionChecklist
>>
>> Will you be able to take care of this when needed (do you have write
>> access to the wiki)?
>>
>> In the mean time, message to others: please let us know if you agree
>> with this, it's difficult to know we have the support of the community
>> if everybody silently agrees!
>
> I'm fine with the idea.  I'm less worried about "credit" for reviewing
> personally, and the suggested format seems a tad verbose perhaps vs
> just formalizing "Approved", but it's probably good to have it be a bit
> different from straight prose to be more explicit.

Hi John,

Thanks for your input! While it is a bit verbose, I didn't find it to be 
a problem when reading through commits that used it (on other projects) 
because of the tag-like formatting. It's quick and easy to identify and 
skip through it when looking through the commit history, and easy to 
automate the emitting from the reviewer side.

>
> It also wasn't clear to me if the intention was for the commits to
> be amended with the annotations?  (I don't think it was explicitly
> stated in the original mail, and I'm not sure if it was an implicit
> assumption?) 
No, I didn't intend on amending previous commits. The main problem this 
change intends to solve is fixing ambiguity, and the pushed patches 
don't have that issue anymore. Thanking a reviewer is just one more 
positive side (IMHO) going forward.

Cheers,
Bruno