From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25479 invoked by alias); 24 May 2003 09:52:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25377 invoked from network); 24 May 2003 09:52:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO aragorn.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.23) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 May 2003 09:52:13 -0000 Received: from zaretsky (tony08-194-113.inter.net.il [80.230.194.113] (may be forged)) by aragorn.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.2.2-GA) with ESMTP id ARH02358; Sat, 24 May 2003 12:51:56 +0300 (IDT) Date: Sat, 24 May 2003 09:52:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: kettenis@chello.nl Message-Id: <6480-Sat24May2003125340+0300-eliz@elta.co.il> CC: gdb@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <200305231652.h4NGqs4Y023667@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> (message from Mark Kettenis on Fri, 23 May 2003 18:52:54 +0200 (CEST)) Subject: Re: [HEADS UP] Merging i386newframe into mailine Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <200305231652.h4NGqs4Y023667@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00337.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 18:52:54 +0200 (CEST) > From: Mark Kettenis > > * Possibly breaking a few unmaintained i386 targets. Could the DJGPP (a.k.a. go32) target be one of those? > I think it's worth running these risks, especially since recent > devlopments on Linux/i386 demand DWARF CFI support on the i386. OTOH, GDB 6 will have many valuable fixes, and it would be a pity to deny those features from users of platforms that could be broken by the merge. So how about waiting for 6.1 with the merge?