From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8774 invoked by alias); 4 Jun 2003 03:27:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 8753 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2003 03:27:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO aragorn.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.23) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Jun 2003 03:27:37 -0000 Received: from zaretsky (tony08-235-247.inter.net.il [80.230.235.247] (may be forged)) by aragorn.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.3.5-GR) with ESMTP id AUF83229; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 06:27:15 +0300 (IDT) Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2003 03:27:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: neroden@twcny.rr.com Message-Id: <7458-Wed04Jun2003062758+0300-eliz@elta.co.il> CC: jsm28@cam.ac.uk, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20030603193258.GA32189@doctormoo> (message from Nathanael Nerode on Tue, 3 Jun 2003 15:32:58 -0400) Subject: Re: Libiberty licensing problems & solutions [DRAFT] Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20030603193258.GA32189@doctormoo> X-SW-Source: 2003-06/txt/msg00047.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 15:32:58 -0400 > From: Nathanael Nerode > > I'm opposed to the GFDL, particularly with "Invariant Sections" Can you tell why?