From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm1-f44.google.com (mail-wm1-f44.google.com [209.85.128.44]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F36073858D1E for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 14:23:58 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org F36073858D1E Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=palves.net Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Received: by mail-wm1-f44.google.com with SMTP id l37-20020a05600c1d2500b003dfe46a9801so11780165wms.0 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 06:23:58 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version :user-agent:date:message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=2ctvuJv+NE8ptAz668UbBgoA9ZnGrpOJuvNE1JHbyfA=; b=3Lhi02cGtCqkaAOHHRIGqX26O9rv1V/JqlPv2d1OnBfdyyoo3KEU/dl2G1YECRGamW SZe9+uYvMRkH3IpOqU5vMYqJrsnLvk+DEjjSj3lptJDVxpVwZzpXfdwdEK9772ikEzwj 55DbT9U5cjdX3dgHqfZRcjVENN2dq2DX6JniGIvoG5vc9xoT5VP1VDGww7U8ytaTvYar TzSJfKgKnkWOB+9NI+N6Vt/60n+DyhW2EmcmhDRh3+TuyZTBrdSS6NiUVN4PHouX83Ev i/GllxoQX7O4ajWFQHsLyP2w78T6eVoP9sZJPcYB2CtY+NEcef0L8C5XmFsgKzZQi19W WLCw== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKXKJPHvfT96mrxGLGQVPPNBwoZWd0mBitdPkKi+OS5Ljdpoyl7M Zta1Gx8TEh8TIq2w2o1hv2vOnLv1cbKIMg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set/WYS6484IVXYEQO/ExO6PpgnLbn9Iw7zOeUo4sxTy53vfUaKUsc4W9GwuKDGDANzSr+dmGyw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1684:b0:3db:fc3:6de4 with SMTP id k4-20020a05600c168400b003db0fc36de4mr2106010wmn.35.1676384637409; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 06:23:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:8a0:f92b:9e00::1fe? ([2001:8a0:f92b:9e00::1fe]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t15-20020a05600c328f00b003dc5b59ed7asm16569281wmp.11.2023.02.14.06.23.56 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 14 Feb 2023 06:23:56 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: Any concrete plans after the GDB BoF? To: Luis Machado , Andrew Burgess , Mark Wielaard Cc: Simon Marchi , Joel Brobecker , Simon Marchi via Gdb References: <83485199-965e-7ff5-1dc8-d027b74b56f7@arm.com> <5924814b-2e53-da09-6125-48ac5a5296e7@simark.ca> <87mt5kunum.fsf@redhat.com> <20230212124345.GH2430@gnu.wildebeest.org> <87r0utu6ew.fsf@redhat.com> <65409b73-fc6d-9a89-3541-31eb1a0b0791@arm.com> From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: <775a1ed2-c034-0536-1ea3-b56504b3d1a5@palves.net> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 14:23:55 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <65409b73-fc6d-9a89-3541-31eb1a0b0791@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On 2023-02-13 12:52 p.m., Luis Machado via Gdb wrote: > I think Mark's point is just that we haven't settled on a particular gnu-for-clang-format rule set. > > Yes, there is a gnu style there already, but we haven't decide if it is good enough or not. > > We just need to play with it for a bit and see if people overall think it is good enough. I've voiced this before in private discussions, but I think never in public. So here goes: I'm in the: "I wouldn't mind using a tool, but I don't think clang-format's current output is good enough" camp.