From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=bnVn=KR=simark.ca=simark@sourceware.org>
Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121])
	by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F7F23858D20
	for <gdb@sourceware.org>; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 15:30:19 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 0F7F23858D20
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=simark.ca
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=simark.ca
ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 0F7F23858D20
Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=158.69.221.121
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1710171020; cv=none;
	b=tQKW/mkLwnWHdyk15OtqBbKJzlPGmIP6ZYL/qu4/FYmDX+baIi/yGOSftB81BcfHu2Pdo3VLye4we08JDjiJ6qP7S1Rm2veOECZnQWG5zVTiGtoRdvW+z9WqZA21F04WSwSNANoszSARdFxWjRIxTROLKVZIts433vBcMemZPJY=
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key;
	t=1710171020; c=relaxed/simple;
	bh=u/AANold2R6iHUbj01Cq/rkU0K0i8R/9DD9hYiBy7wA=;
	h=DKIM-Signature:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From; b=jBg+66KmEoSD1NBB3rwryRoHZL44aHZddsCXc85h0J76jFNfOk68ZQfuchvfmOJo3c9p1fkQj4zt63AhdDwswljWIhpKb6ws6g+ikl78g+gehQjuhCBCQ4kYz5fobSJK4JpZLUSu6uZ11HXkqDRWglm1AoOBA4eCyJmVhJ9BnVM=
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=simark.ca; s=mail;
	t=1710171018; bh=u/AANold2R6iHUbj01Cq/rkU0K0i8R/9DD9hYiBy7wA=;
	h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To:From;
	b=aloWfDKW7PQYI5rytbylu2wyPSC/hLeFQ/3V6mfZsMq8XmUnzi4qxpgFV0H+vCXYO
	 tprVB4Xe7Lr0w1ZvIhFl1jj5DQIEnU/gTpQEyqXeTgoj0gMYqIUKJLM5f5MFC2ej4C
	 qyFXbOuXITaVhOqBgkO3Fp7fxFoWbH5eg37nZ6W4=
Received: from [172.16.0.192] (192-222-143-198.qc.cable.ebox.net [192.222.143.198])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256)
	(No client certificate requested)
	by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 68BE61E0AC;
	Mon, 11 Mar 2024 11:30:17 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <7bf4f993-11d6-4b5c-a70b-cbbe00399952@simark.ca>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 11:30:16 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Updating libbacktrace
To: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>, gdb@sourceware.org
References: <87plw4r5ta.fsf@gentoo.org>
Content-Language: fr
From: Simon Marchi <simark@simark.ca>
In-Reply-To: <87plw4r5ta.fsf@gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>

On 3/8/24 12:28, Sam James via Gdb wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Could one of the GDB global maintainers possibly update libbacktrace
> from the copy in gcc.git?
> 
> I'm also happy to do it if delegated to. Whatever works for me.
> 
> I originally asked at https://sourceware.org/PR31327 (as it fixes some
> test failures) where Ian ACKed it, but wasn't sure of the policy on
> it. Nick, the binutils maintainer, deferred to GDB as GDB is the primary
> consumer of libbacktrace.
> 
> Nick also suggested we clarify its status in MAINTAINERS.
> 
> thanks,
> sam

Hi Sam,

The easiest would be if you sent a patch to gdb-patches (and maybe CC
binutils) for it.

Thanks,

Simon