From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 950843858CDB for ; Sun, 9 Oct 2022 00:29:22 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 950843858CDB Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=simark.ca Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=simark.ca Received: from [10.0.0.11] (unknown [217.28.27.60]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 51C271E0CB; Sat, 8 Oct 2022 20:29:21 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=simark.ca; s=mail; t=1665275361; bh=GCXDnpK0IlDrpyUNI+Z8WvSqu7Dj0mthMbtzJVHFVzY=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=bhNrZVPILVms3LDTlwyfEXYZ/1D2hy4WB7IfX+3fCG0EKw5QFDJJ+34DcFUlgx61E 14Swc3p6yJZbFowd6eRIbpwkUttDw/QaIvPAEaAIztodEcBFL9pOi64avDr1TbIjvI LftqRqz66Ha3DIAT6SCuCGVeP6cwzgzLYlOxFoqk= Message-ID: <7d3aac6e-fd5a-c900-e88e-7ee6c143d366@simark.ca> Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2022 20:29:20 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.3.1 Subject: Re: Proposal: Add review tags to patch review workflow. To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb@sourceware.org References: <754258e5-b9b7-0785-5580-f8f54e7ad6ad@simark.ca> <83y1tqltpp.fsf@gnu.org> <790305bd-9cdf-9dbc-6b8e-b55f1f70258f@simark.ca> <834jwelc26.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-US From: Simon Marchi In-Reply-To: <834jwelc26.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: > They were followed by discussion and some changes, AFAIR. Also, the > original post was quite long, so I hoped for a concise version akin a > cookbook. I just re-read the thread and I didn't find any changes to the proposal in the original post. Maybe some precisions. In any case, Bruno will update the wiki, it should be a short and sweet section. It doesn't need to explain all the rationale like the original post did. Simon