Re: arm-elf-gdb crash

[Shaun Jackman <sjackman@gmail.com>]

2005/5/6, Shaun Jackman <sjackman@gmail.com>:
> On 5/6/05, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> wrote:
> > GDB associates registers to frames.  It's written to the assumption
> > that there is always a frame; when there isn't, this is just one of
> > many things that is going to go wrong.
> 
> When the target's gone toes-up like this, normally I don't want to do
> any further source-level debugging. I'm more interested in peeking and
> poking a few registers to do some post-mortem analysis before I reload
> the target. When a frame isn't available, could GDB fall back to a set
> of global registers?
> 
> Cheers,
> Shaun

Hello,

This is a quick poll to see if there's been any movement on the "Value
being assigned to is no longer active." bug. It haunts me daily.

(gdb) set $cpsr=0x1f
Value being assigned to is no longer active.

Cheers!
Shaun