From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-23205-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 11457 invoked by alias); 14 Nov 2005 22:59:17 -0000
Received: (qmail 11445 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Nov 2005 22:59:15 -0000
Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (HELO xproxy.gmail.com) (66.249.82.202)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 22:59:15 +0000
Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s9so710112wxc
        for <gdb@sources.redhat.com>; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 14:59:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.64.179.4 with SMTP id b4mr5976492qbf;
        Mon, 14 Nov 2005 14:59:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.65.20.19 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 14:59:11 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <7f45d9390511141459s65fa4f61y@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 22:59:00 -0000
From: Shaun Jackman <sjackman@gmail.com>
Reply-To: Shaun Jackman <sjackman@gmail.com>
To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Simulating arm-linux binaries
In-Reply-To: <20051114223116.GA4991@nevyn.them.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <7f45d9390511141428q190485f5l@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20051114223116.GA4991@nevyn.them.org>
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg00275.txt.bz2

2005/11/14, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>:
> Have you considered just using qemu instead?  It supports ARM usermode
> emulation, and has a gdb server as a bonus.

I didn't know qemu-arm existed. Thanks for the pointer.

I used this howto [1] to set up qemu-arm, but it's failing as follows:

$ qemu-arm -L arm arm/bin/ls
Unable to load interpreter
Segmentation fault
$ qemu-arm --version
qemu-arm version 0.7.2, Copyright (c) 2003-2005 Fabrice Bellard

[1] http://people.debian.org/~ballombe/qemu/qemu.html/

> > These two invocations of the same binary seem to be going down very
> > different code paths within glibc. Any idea why that is? Is gdb
> > calling the ARMulator differently somehow than sim?
>
> No idea - it shouldn't be.

Odd.

Cheers,
Shaun