From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B59FA3857C70 for ; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 18:32:04 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org B59FA3857C70 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:39421) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lL93T-0006I1-Id; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 13:32:03 -0500 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3147 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lL93R-0003xD-M3; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 13:32:03 -0500 Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 20:32:06 +0200 Message-Id: <8335wyj461.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Mike Frysinger Cc: gdb@sourceware.org, andrew.burgess@embecosm.com In-Reply-To: (message from Mike Frysinger on Sat, 13 Mar 2021 13:21:29 -0500) Subject: Re: sim: replacing ChangeLog files with online git logs References: <83ft0zjys1.fsf@gnu.org> <83lfarhwjq.fsf@gnu.org> <83eegjhuuq.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 18:32:05 -0000 > Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 13:21:29 -0500 > From: Mike Frysinger > Cc: gdb@sourceware.org, andrew.burgess@embecosm.com > > On 13 Mar 2021 18:38, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 11:26:11 -0500 > > > From: Mike Frysinger > > > Cc: gdb@sourceware.org, andrew.burgess@embecosm.com > > > > > > > So people who don't have Git will be left without the logs? I'm not > > > > sure I'm okay with that. > > > > > > what value are people actually pulling from these ? we aren't talking > > > about user-focused NEWS, we're talking about developer-focused ChangeLog. > > > > This has been beaten to death in various forums, including GNU > > internal ones. the conclusion was that some people want that, and > > some developers are not always on-line and with Git repo handy. > > the conclusion is that GNU standards made recommendations, but individual > projects can pick between them. That's a different conclusions. You asked what people are doing with the ChangeLogs, not whether it was mandatory to keep them. > > There's a Gnulib script which will produce the form that matches the > > ChangeLog format. > > there's actually multiple gnulib scripts. which one are you referring to ? > gitlog-to-changelog ? Yes, that one.