From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E4423840C1B for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 15:57:00 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 5E4423840C1B Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:48829) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kZcCZ-0004L0-JG; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 10:56:59 -0500 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2438 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kZcCV-0004mK-TZ; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 10:56:57 -0500 Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2020 17:56:47 +0200 Message-Id: <83361reoqo.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Alexander Fedotov Cc: gdb@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: (message from Alexander Fedotov via Gdb on Mon, 2 Nov 2020 15:53:47 +0300) Subject: Re: duplicated html help files References: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2020 15:57:01 -0000 > Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2020 15:53:47 +0300 > From: Alexander Fedotov via Gdb > > I am doing a GDB 9.2 build using MinGW on a linux machine and found that > GDB documentation generates files frame-apply.html and Frame-Apply.html. > The difference is in filename case only. > Whilst this is fine on linux this makes a problem to unpack tarball on > windows.Yes, it is possible to workaround this by corresponding switch to > unpack utility and overwrite file. But this breaks HTML helps I guess... I believe you are talking about building the HTML version of the GDB manual. If so, please report this problem to the Texinfo developers (bug-texinfo@gnu.org), since GDB just uses the Texinfo tools to produce the docs. It's a Texinfo problem that it creates such file-name clashes on case-insensitive filesystems.