From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C3F93851C11; Sat, 30 May 2020 19:35:37 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 3C3F93851C11 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=gnu.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=eliz@gnu.org Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:43247) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jf7GY-0003u7-Ml; Sat, 30 May 2020 15:35:35 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2657 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jf7GY-0000w9-4F; Sat, 30 May 2020 15:35:34 -0400 Date: Sat, 30 May 2020 22:35:29 +0300 Message-Id: <83h7vxkygu.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Tom Tromey Cc: mliska@suse.cz, simark@simark.ca, hjl.tools@gmail.com, binutils@sourceware.org, gdb@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <87367hrzua.fsf@tromey.com> (message from Tom Tromey on Sat, 30 May 2020 13:23:57 -0600) Subject: Re: Auto update ChangeLog for binutils+gdb commits? References: <891ef86a-a47f-18f2-c6bd-e525719e3768@simark.ca> <9492d857-c259-1429-f1c7-31a6dbf6510f@simark.ca> <1fb47dab-7a52-524b-17a3-672122277a48@suse.cz> <87tuzzaqey.fsf@tromey.com> <83tuzyn8sd.fsf@gnu.org> <87367hrzua.fsf@tromey.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 May 2020 19:35:38 -0000 > From: Tom Tromey > Cc: Tom Tromey , mliska@suse.cz, simark@simark.ca, > hjl.tools@gmail.com, binutils@sourceware.org, gdb@sourceware.org > Date: Sat, 30 May 2020 13:23:57 -0600 > > Eli> Having the names of the functions in the log is one of the most > Eli> important reasons for following the ChangeLog format. If it were not > Eli> for that reason, we could let people write free-text log messages, > Eli> because file names are easily gleaned from the VCS log. > > If the mklog script works, then the function names are also easily > computed from the diff. If all the script does is look at the hunk headers of the diffs, then indeed such a script doesn't have any added value. I thought it did a more thorough (and thus more accurate) job than that.