public inbox for gdb@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Inadvertently run inferior threads
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 17:21:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <83ioaoopkh.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <557EEF0E.1040400@redhat.com>

> Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 16:28:14 +0100
> From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
> CC: gdb@sourceware.org
> 
> >> So that should mean that even for GNU/Linux, it should be possible
> >> to end in the exact same, when any thread other than the one that we
> >> had started the infcall in reports an event that doesn't cause a stop.
> >> E.g., a thread specific breakpoint, a "handle nostop" signal, etc.
> > 
> > Does that involve minus_one_ptid on GNU/Linux as well?  If not, that
> > call will not mark all threads as running, will it?
> 
> It does.  user_visible_resume_ptid returns the same irrespective
> of target_can_async.

Then how come your test program ended up showing just that additional
thread running?  You even said you couldn't explain why I saw all my
threads running on Windows.

  reply	other threads:[~2015-06-15 17:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-12 17:11 Eli Zaretskii
2015-03-14 13:40 ` Pedro Alves
2015-03-14 14:56   ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-03-14 15:36     ` Pedro Alves
2015-03-14 15:51       ` Pedro Alves
2015-03-14 15:58         ` Pedro Alves
2015-06-10 15:15           ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-03-14 16:06         ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-06-10 15:50         ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-06-11 13:42           ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-06-15 13:18             ` Pedro Alves
2015-06-15 15:27               ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-06-15 15:42                 ` Pedro Alves
2015-06-23  4:07                   ` Doug Evans
2015-06-23 12:19                     ` Pedro Alves
2015-06-23 19:11                       ` Pedro Alves
2015-06-23 19:52                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-06-24 14:29                           ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-06-29 15:57                             ` Pedro Alves
2015-06-23 14:58                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-06-15 13:01           ` Pedro Alves
2015-06-15 15:14             ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-06-15 15:28               ` Pedro Alves
2015-06-15 17:21                 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2015-06-15 17:56                   ` Pedro Alves
2015-06-15 19:07                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-06-23 11:51                     ` Pedro Alves
2015-03-14 16:04       ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-03-14 16:15         ` Pedro Alves
2015-03-14 16:17           ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-03-14 16:23             ` Pedro Alves
2015-03-14 17:01               ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-03-14 17:46                 ` Pedro Alves
2015-06-10 15:13     ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-06-15 13:08       ` Pedro Alves
2015-06-15 15:15         ` Eli Zaretskii

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=83ioaoopkh.fsf@gnu.org \
    --to=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
    --cc=palves@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).