From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92C823857C50 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 17:39:36 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 92C823857C50 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:60649) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lP7Tg-0000H4-Ce; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 13:39:35 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3766 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lP7Ta-0006Sl-W0; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 13:39:27 -0400 Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 19:39:24 +0200 Message-Id: <83lfacjvsj.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Andrew Burgess Cc: vapier@gentoo.org, gdb@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <20210324165918.GA1683671@embecosm.com> (message from Andrew Burgess on Wed, 24 Mar 2021 16:59:18 +0000) Subject: Re: sim: replacing ChangeLog files with online git logs References: <83eegjhuuq.fsf@gnu.org> <8335wyj461.fsf@gnu.org> <83tup9disi.fsf@gnu.org> <20210323110638.GA6592@embecosm.com> <83wntwjy8h.fsf@gnu.org> <20210324165918.GA1683671@embecosm.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 17:39:37 -0000 > Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 16:59:18 +0000 > From: Andrew Burgess > Cc: Mike Frysinger , gdb@sourceware.org > > * Eli Zaretskii [2021-03-24 18:46:38 +0200]: > > > > Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 23:45:24 -0400 > > > From: Mike Frysinger > > > Cc: gdb@sourceware.org, Andrew Burgess > > > > > > Eli: those patches look OK to you too ? > > > > They just add the script to our repository, AFAICT, so I of course > > have no objections. > > No the second proposes to replace the current ChangeLog with one > auto-generated upon release. > > This ChangeLog would in effect be a reformatted `git log` output. I don't object to that, either. The question is: what we will require the Git log messages to contain then? Currently, the entire ChangeLog entry goes there, but once the manually written ChangeLog files are retired, what will remain? That was the crux of the recent discussion. > For the simulator this would mean there would no longer be any file > that contained output in the format as: > > * file.c (symbol): description. Well, I personally will lament the loss of that information. It's up toy you-all to decide how much does that weigh.