From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12301 invoked by alias); 11 Dec 2019 16:35:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 12226 invoked by uid 89); 11 Dec 2019 16:35:35 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=weight, H*MI:sk:617317b, H*f:sk:617317b X-HELO: eggs.gnu.org Received: from eggs.gnu.org (HELO eggs.gnu.org) (209.51.188.92) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 16:35:34 +0000 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:45212) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1if4xY-0008Ke-2T; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 11:35:32 -0500 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1927 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1if4xX-0003NI-G8; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 11:35:31 -0500 Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 16:35:00 -0000 Message-Id: <83sglqakhg.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Pedro Alves CC: cbiesinger@google.com, gdb@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <617317be-2567-fd53-135d-8ed391ae1a86@redhat.com> (message from Pedro Alves on Wed, 11 Dec 2019 10:59:07 +0000) Subject: Re: Renaming .c files to .cc? References: <617317be-2567-fd53-135d-8ed391ae1a86@redhat.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-12/txt/msg00008.txt.bz2 > From: Pedro Alves > Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 10:59:07 +0000 > > IMO, renaming the files has a disproportionate cost/benefit ratio. > I'm not terribly opposed, but I'm in the "prefer not" camp. FWIW, I'm in the same camp (although my opinion's weight is much lower than Pedro's, as I get/need to work with GDB's Git much less than he does).