From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04EA43947C0B for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 15:21:30 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 04EA43947C0B Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:45436) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kMuy1-0004uf-HS; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 11:21:29 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1515 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kMuy0-0007MV-Qb; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 11:21:29 -0400 Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 18:21:17 +0300 Message-Id: <83v9fykjv6.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <20200928151523.GD15552@adacore.com> (message from Joel Brobecker on Mon, 28 Sep 2020 08:15:23 -0700) Subject: Re: Unable to build GDB on Windows References: <833632m10q.fsf@gnu.org> <83zh5aklls.fsf@gnu.org> <20200928151523.GD15552@adacore.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 15:21:32 -0000 > Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 08:15:23 -0700 > From: Joel Brobecker > > > Btw, looking at Gnulib's getrandom.c, my conclusion is that a GDB > > built on Windows 7 and later will be unable to run on older versions > > of Windows, because it will have a static dependency on bcrypt.dll and > > the BCryptGenRandom function from that DLL. IOW, such a GDB will > > refuse to run on older Windows systems. > > I think that's fine. IMO, the general spirit should be that people > interested in building a GDB that works on multiple versions of > an OS should build it on the oldest version they want to support. > I don't think we want to commit to anything stronger than that. Maybe just say that in some README?