public inbox for gdb@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Arnez <arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: jan.kratochvil@redhat.com, gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Strange behavior of sigstep-threads.exp?
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 18:47:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <874nki6bfq.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50A3C376.9080602@redhat.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Wed, 14	Nov 2012 16:14:46 +0000")

Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> writes:

> linux-nat.c always gives preference to a SIGTRAP over other signals,
> so it's unexpected that a trap could be lost.  Maybe while GDB goes
> about stopping all threads with SIGSTOP (in effect, only the
> single-stepped thread), the single step has actually completed, but
> the kernel manages to report the SIGSTOP first, for some bizarre
> reason?  IOW, the kernel loses the trap.

Right, the kernel loses the trap.

While processing the SIGUSR1 from thread #2, GDB stops all other threads
with SIGSTOP -- in this case the single-stepped thread #1.  Now if the
SIGSTOP is sent after thread #1 has received the single-step exception,
but before the kernel has decided what signals to present, the kernel
suppresses the SIGTRAP and just delivers the SIGSTOP instead.

Discussed this with the s390 kernel maintainer.  A kernel patch is on
the way.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-11-21 18:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-08 15:51 Andreas Arnez
2012-11-12 16:38 ` Pedro Alves
2012-11-13 15:21   ` Andreas Arnez
2012-11-14 16:15     ` Pedro Alves
2012-11-21 18:47       ` Andreas Arnez [this message]
2012-11-21 19:19         ` Pedro Alves

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=874nki6bfq.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
    --cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
    --cc=palves@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).