From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A51238475B6 for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 02:48:10 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 1A51238475B6 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1670899689; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Bf2j6xkvhbXKecC5h8U6nVWImcdLnDkEHB4Tx39ULgc=; b=ZvqBcwYN3r/KA9qziCDdTDkciND0tx2t9xWE1DGm51dMGt7oOkqV6VYEGSAkmTN+UJAW3r Qru3ECVXovKENx/A/cLW+CA8LoNIEVNeMQOGVW41g+emuUvbv3J3QcjW21BVhOuiAykQrT OcUSiMq8/3kU/vrt0u9LNkMd8BBut/8= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-656-t8r0quqdNoK-856mGx4Xew-1; Mon, 12 Dec 2022 21:48:08 -0500 X-MC-Unique: t8r0quqdNoK-856mGx4Xew-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C38A801580; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 02:48:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (unknown [10.2.16.56]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26BC5492B00; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 02:48:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=vm-rhel7) by redhat.com with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1p4vKs-0002u0-Jt; Mon, 12 Dec 2022 21:48:03 -0500 From: fche@redhat.com (Frank Ch. Eigler) To: Luis Machado Cc: "gdb\@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: Any concrete plans after the GDB BoF? References: <83485199-965e-7ff5-1dc8-d027b74b56f7@arm.com> Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2022 21:48:02 -0500 In-Reply-To: <83485199-965e-7ff5-1dc8-d027b74b56f7@arm.com> (Luis Machado via Gdb's message of "Thu, 27 Oct 2022 11:47:56 +0100") Message-ID: <87a63sf28t.fsf@redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.10 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Luis Machado via Gdb writes: > [...] > Simon was kind enough to cleanup the patchworks instance, though that > is not yet fully integrated into > something we can easily use to do tests/CI. I see the number of > unreviewed patches is growing again. Note that gdb maintainers can push hypothetical patches to personal try-branches on sourceware.org ("git push origin users/$USERID/try-TOPIC"), and the local buildbot environment will build that branch on a variety of hosts, report build failures, and store test results in bunsen. This is not integrated into patchwork, but is easily triggered by anyone with commit privileges. - FChE