public inbox for gdb@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
To: Walt Drummond via Gdb <gdb@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: AMD64_LINUX_frame_size
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2021 14:19:03 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87eeiwv41k.fsf@tromey.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADCN6nxVYmjS+D0VX5-DqRTvf-Xc-EjN7cJ1vRyehg+vV6tVig@mail.gmail.com> (Walt Drummond via Gdb's message of "Wed, 6 Jan 2021 08:38:59 -0800")

>>>>> "Walt" == Walt Drummond via Gdb <gdb@sourceware.org> writes:

Walt> After looking at this further, I think I understand AMD64_LINUX_frame_size
Walt> and why it differs from the size of the kernel's rt_sigframe (differences
Walt> between glibc's and the kernels' definition of sigset_t), but I don't
Walt> understand how GDB arrived at 512 for AMD_LINUX_xstate.  The kernel's math
Walt> frame, which also contains the extended state information, is 840 bytes.  I
Walt> feel I must be missing something.  Any pointers?

I don't really know, but from a quick look at this code, it seems like
this is only used by the process record code, and furthermore only like:

  if (record_full_arch_list_add_mem (rsp, AMD64_LINUX_redzone
				     + AMD64_LINUX_xstate
				     + AMD64_LINUX_frame_size))
    return -1;

These are defined as:

#define AMD64_LINUX_redzone    128
#define AMD64_LINUX_xstate     512
#define AMD64_LINUX_frame_size 560

which adds up to 1200, which maybe is also wrong (dunno), but at least
is larger and maybe (also dunno) harmless in this context.

Tom

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-07 21:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-04 18:30 AMD64_LINUX_frame_size Walt Drummond
2021-01-06 16:38 ` AMD64_LINUX_frame_size Walt Drummond
2021-01-07 21:19   ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2021-01-07 21:49     ` AMD64_LINUX_frame_size Walt Drummond
2021-01-09 20:14       ` AMD64_LINUX_frame_size Tom Tromey
2021-01-11 10:43       ` AMD64_LINUX_frame_size Florian Weimer
2021-01-12 16:10         ` AMD64_LINUX_frame_size Walt Drummond

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87eeiwv41k.fsf@tromey.com \
    --to=tom@tromey.com \
    --cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).