From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 299DD38515DD for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 08:01:08 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 299DD38515DD Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-m68k.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nefkom.net Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4GTWPG67jJz1qyJP; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 10:01:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.70]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4GTWPG3LYTz1qr3q; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 10:01:06 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FvHIEKogxRSP; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 10:01:04 +0200 (CEST) X-Auth-Info: 8tJr6voBfu0cgxfhOwfoNC5+HxXKb1Y7Wd9aiAfSYkkFTo7wQUalUd40GdodTr9S Received: from igel.home (ppp-46-244-165-123.dynamic.mnet-online.de [46.244.165.123]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 10:01:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8660F2C029F; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 10:01:03 +0200 (CEST) From: Andreas Schwab To: Carl Love via Gdb Cc: Andrew Burgess , Carl Love Subject: Re: Question: gdb.tui/tui-layout-asm.exp References: <20210719164804.GC1688065@embecosm.com> X-Yow: Now I'm being INVOLUNTARILY shuffled closer to the CLAM DIP with the BROKEN PLASTIC FORKS in it!! Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 10:01:03 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Carl Love via Gdb's message of "Mon, 19 Jul 2021 15:22:30 -0700") Message-ID: <87k0llct34.fsf@igel.home> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, KAM_SHORT, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 08:01:11 -0000 On Jul 19 2021, Carl Love via Gdb wrote: > So the if statement is checking to see if line1 matches the re_line > above it. The match statement is > > [regexp $re_line [Term::get_line 1]] > > The final test fails for some reason? Have you checked that [Term::get_line 1] really returns the same thing in both calls? Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1 "And now for something completely different."