From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12848 invoked by alias); 1 Nov 2012 20:38:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 12839 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Nov 2012 20:38:32 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 20:38:29 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qA1KcQrh009142 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 1 Nov 2012 16:38:26 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qA1KcPY1017568 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 1 Nov 2012 16:38:26 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Doug Evans Cc: Pedro Alves , "Maucci\, Cyrille" , "gdb\@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: working around batch mode command errors References: <7D0928B9A8397D4B9E2F9E5FFFB8D860027BED37@G6W2492.americas.hpqcorp.net> <509010B5.6050309@redhat.com> <87390vyhxq.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2012 20:38:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Doug Evans's message of "Thu, 1 Nov 2012 13:30:43 -0700") Message-ID: <87pq3xqcse.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg00001.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Doug" == Doug Evans writes: Doug> I went looking for the bugzilla entry but couldn't find it. http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8487 Doug> try: Doug> gdb.execute (...) Doug> except: Doug> pass Doug> is just too much to type. Doug> :-) :) We can have both try/catch and ignore-errors, if we want. Tom