From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15631 invoked by alias); 5 Mar 2012 21:04:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 15620 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Mar 2012 21:04:15 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SARE_SUB_ENC_UTF8,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 21:03:59 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q25L3wCU023975 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 5 Mar 2012 16:03:58 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q25L3vga026692 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 5 Mar 2012 16:03:57 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Cc: , Subject: Re: Using UTF-8 as host charset References: <4F52480A.6000507@gmail.com> <09787EF419216C41A903FD14EE5506DD03138CBD68@AUSX7MCPC103.AMER.DELL.COM> <87mx7ux6mf.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <09787EF419216C41A903FD14EE5506DD03138CBF87@AUSX7MCPC103.AMER.DELL.COM> Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 21:04:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <09787EF419216C41A903FD14EE5506DD03138CBF87@AUSX7MCPC103.AMER.DELL.COM> (Paul Koning's message of "Mon, 5 Mar 2012 12:11:31 -0600") Message-ID: <87r4x6vjya.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.94 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg00015.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Paul" == writes: Paul> The issue here is that NetBSD has a fully functional iconv, except Paul> that it doesn't include the wchar_t "character set". I think it has Paul> something to do with the notion that wchar_t is not the same as ucs-2, Paul> at least not in some corner cases. I'm not particularly convinced, Paul> especially since GNU libiconv does make that exact equivalence. GNU iconv uses mbrtowc and friends to do the conversion in a portable way. I'm open to other ways to solve the problem as well. I just don't know of any. Tom