public inbox for gdb@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi via Gdb <gdb@sourceware.org>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	 tom@tromey.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,  pedro@palves.net,
	 "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: How to backtrace an separate stack?
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2022 15:49:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sfrtakce.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YiCk+NNtAGQPhyK5@stefanha-x1.localdomain> (Stefan Hajnoczi via Gdb's message of "Thu, 3 Mar 2022 11:22:32 +0000")

* Stefan Hajnoczi via Gdb:

> The QEMU emulator uses coroutines with separate stacks. It can be
> challenging to debug coroutines that have yielded because GDB is not
> aware of them (no thread is currently executing them).
>
> QEMU has a GDB Python script that helps. It "creates" a stack frame for
> a given coroutine by temporarily setting register values and then using
> the "bt" command. This works on a live process under ptrace control but
> not for coredumps where registers can't be set.
>
> Here is the script (or see the bottom of this email for an inline copy
> of the relevant code):
> https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/blob/master/scripts/qemugdb/coroutine.py
>
> I hoped that "select-frame address ADDRESS" could be used instead so
> this would work on coredumps too. Unfortunately "select-frame" only
> searches stack frames that GDB is already aware of, so it cannot be used
> to backtrace coroutine stacks.
>
> Is there a way to backtrace a stack at an arbitrary address in GDB?

I'm a bit surprised by this.  Conceptually, why would GDB need to know
about stack boundaries?  Is there some heuristic to detect broken
frames?

Thanks,
Florian


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-03-07 14:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-03 11:22 Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-03-07 10:49 ` Pedro Alves
2022-03-08  9:47   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-03-07 14:49 ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2022-03-07 17:30   ` Tom Tromey
2022-03-09 10:06     ` Florian Weimer
2022-03-09 19:50       ` Tom Tromey
2022-03-07 16:58 ` Tom Tromey
2022-03-07 17:18   ` Pedro Alves
2022-03-08  8:43     ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-03-14 20:30   ` Tom Tromey
2022-03-15 14:17     ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-03-18 21:13       ` Tom Tromey

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87sfrtakce.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com \
    --to=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
    --cc=pedro@palves.net \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=tom@tromey.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).