public inbox for gdb@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Cc: Pierre Muller <pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr>, gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: New ARI web page, generated using script inside CVS tree in gdb/contrib/ari directory
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 16:41:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sj8c2l44.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121112180707.GQ4847@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of	"Mon, 12 Nov 2012 10:07:07 -0800")

>>>>> "Joel" == Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com> writes:

Joel> But perhaps we should also look at possibly importing gnulib's stat
Joel> and sys_wait modules? Not a trivial change in the sense that it could
Joel> be not equivalent to what we have now, and thus have unintended
Joel> consequences; but perhaps worth a shot. I think that gdb_stat.h and
Joel> all other such headers were GDB's own way of doing what gnulib does
Joel> in general.

FWIW I tend to favor more use of gnulib in gdb.  In general I think the
pros outweigh the cons; especially since it seems reasonably easy to get
fixes into gnulib, and because importing a new gnulib snapshot is also
simple.

The pros seem to be -- shared development, good documentation, and
letting the main gdb source use standard headers and standard functions.

I think the primary con is that a gnulib module may have a bug, and then
we have to fix it elsewhere first.  This doesn't seem to be a major
problem.

Tom

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-11-14 16:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-12  9:37 Pierre Muller
2012-11-12 18:07 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-11-12 18:28   ` Pedro Alves
2012-11-12 18:38     ` Joel Brobecker
2012-11-12 18:48       ` Pedro Alves
2012-11-12 18:52         ` Joel Brobecker
2012-11-12 18:38   ` run the ARI on gdbserver too? Pedro Alves
2012-11-13 10:01     ` Pierre Muller
2012-11-16 16:03     ` Pierre Muller
2012-11-16 16:14       ` Pedro Alves
2012-11-14 16:41   ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2012-11-14 16:59     ` New ARI web page, generated using script inside CVS tree in gdb/contrib/ari directory Joel Brobecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87sj8c2l44.fsf@fleche.redhat.com \
    --to=tromey@redhat.com \
    --cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
    --cc=pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).