From: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
To: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com>
Cc: gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Thread Specific Architectures And Python Unwinder API
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 14:02:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wmvsat8i.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <29fefb89-9934-4e9d-9ea0-adf40789e921@arm.com>
Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com> writes:
> On 10/11/23 11:06, Luis Machado wrote:
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> On 10/11/23 09:47, Andrew Burgess wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Luis,
>>>
>>> While working on something else I was looking at the Python Unwinder API
>>> code, and I suspect that the thread-specific architectures support might
>>> (currently) break the Python Unwinder support.
>>>
>>> If it is, then I think the fix is pretty simple, but before I posted it,
>>> I wondered if you could confirm that things are indeed, currently
>>> broken.
>>>
>>> Attached at the end of this email is a Python unwinder. You'll need to
>>> supply your own test program that makes use of sve/sme, and thus uses
>>> thread-specific architectures.
>>>
>>> What you'll need to do is:
>>>
>>> $ gdb -q test_file_that_uses_sve_sme
>>> Reading symbols from .... etc ...
>>> (gdb) source ./unwinder.py
>>> (gdb) break function_where_a_thread_specific_arch_will_be_in_use
>>> Breakpoint 1 at ... etc ...
>>> (gdb) run
>>> Starting program: ... etc ...
>>>
>>> Now at this point, when you stop, you should see at least one instance
>>> of the banner:
>>>
>>> ***********************************
>>> * Have executed the test unwinder *
>>> ***********************************
>>>
>>> being printed, probably more. As you step though the function you
>>> should see more instances of the banner being printed.
>>>
>>> To reveal the bug then it is important that when GDB stops in
>>> function_where_a_thread_specific_arch_will_be_in_use, the per-thread
>>> gdbarch that it creates _must_ be different from the inferior wide,
>>> top-level gdbarch.
>>>
>>> If you don't see the banner then my suspicion is correct, and the Python
>>> Unwinder API was broken when the thread-specific architecture support
>>> was added.
>
> I've confirmed I don't see the banner. So this seems to be broken.
>
> Is the fix to set the python unwinder hook elsewhere? Or maybe save that
> information when we're trying to pick a different gdbarch?
I'll post my patch for this later today. But I'm going to propose
changing the 'architecture_changed' observable into a 'new_architecture'
observable (which is called in a different place). As such, every new
architecture will have the Python unwinder registered correctly.
I just need to update the commit message with some details of this issue
as justification for the change, and I'll post it -- it's a pretty small
change. I'll CC you on the new thread.
Thanks,
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-12 13:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-11 8:47 Andrew Burgess
2023-10-11 10:06 ` Luis Machado
2023-10-12 11:30 ` Luis Machado
2023-10-12 13:02 ` Andrew Burgess [this message]
2023-10-12 13:11 ` Luis Machado
2023-10-12 14:25 ` Andrew Burgess
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87wmvsat8i.fsf@redhat.com \
--to=aburgess@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
--cc=luis.machado@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).