From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32365 invoked by alias); 11 Nov 2004 15:07:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 31839 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2004 15:06:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO az18nt140.honeywell.com) (199.64.7.140) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 11 Nov 2004 15:06:44 -0000 Received: from AZ18CN686.honeywell.com ([131.127.165.152]) by az18nt140.honeywell.com with InterScan Messaging Security Suite; Thu, 11 Nov 2004 08:06:35 -0700 Received: from az18cn576.honeywell.com ([131.127.165.150]) by AZ18CN686.honeywell.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2657.72) id WVJ8H0RP; Thu, 11 Nov 2004 08:06:34 -0700 Received: by az18cn576.honeywell.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id ; Thu, 11 Nov 2004 08:06:34 -0700 Message-ID: <938F1554888BD71194E100B0D0FCD97201AAD7E3@ge51smail2.ge51.honeywell.de> From: "Schneider, Jan (GE51)" To: 'Steven Johnson' Cc: "'gdb@sources.redhat.com'" Subject: RE: set architecture for MPC8xx Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 16:49:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00106.txt.bz2 ok. I thought I only need such stub for remote debugging. Where can I found this stub? or do I have to implement one? Jan -----Original Message----- From: Steven Johnson [mailto:sjohnson@neurizon.net] Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 11:12 PM To: Schneider, Jan (GE51) Cc: 'gdb@sources.redhat.com' Subject: Re: set architecture for MPC8xx Your target stub needs to support the "Architecture" otherwise it wont know how to set or get the values of the registers. If the target stub only reports/handles registers for the "generic" architecture, you will need to change it to handle all of the other registers. Steven Schneider, Jan (GE51) wrote: >Hello, > >I have tried the "set architecture" command for the powerpc MPC8xx. After >this I see a lot of new registers. >But for me it seems that these registers aren't really taking effects after >changing their values. >I found them in rs6000-tdep.c. > >Is there a way to use these additional registers sensible? > >thanks > > > >