From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB457383E82B; Wed, 27 May 2020 14:29:10 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org EB457383E82B Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=simark.ca Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=simark@simark.ca Received: from [172.16.0.95] (192-222-181-218.qc.cable.ebox.net [192.222.181.218]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 618EE1E5F9; Wed, 27 May 2020 10:29:10 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: Auto generate ChangeLog for binutils commits? To: "H.J. Lu" Cc: Binutils , GDB References: <891ef86a-a47f-18f2-c6bd-e525719e3768@simark.ca> From: Simon Marchi Message-ID: <9492d857-c259-1429-f1c7-31a6dbf6510f@simark.ca> Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 10:29:09 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: tl Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 14:29:12 -0000 On 2020-05-27 10:20 a.m., H.J. Lu wrote: > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 7:10 AM Simon Marchi wrote: >> >> On 2020-05-26 1:07 p.m., H.J. Lu via Gdb wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I had an impression that ChangeLog was auto generated for GDB commits. >>> If it is true, should we do the same for binutils commits? >>> >>> -- >>> H.J. >>> >> >> No we (GDB) don't do that. There was a discussion here >> >> https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-February/165728.html >> >> But it didn't go anywhere. Note that when I actually tried the script, it >> didn't produce good results (perhaps because it wasn't designed with C++ >> in mind). > > GCC will auto generate ChangeLog entry from git commit message. Can > binutils+gdb do the same? Can you please explain what this means? I suspect that we are not talking about the same thing. You mean, still write the ChangeLog entry by hand, but only put it in the git commit. And then a script scrapes all the commit messages in order to produce a ChangeLog file? Simon