From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-40226-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 21691 invoked by alias); 22 Nov 2011 22:11:46 -0000
Received: (qmail 21683 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Nov 2011 22:11:45 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail.windriver.com (HELO mail.windriver.com) (147.11.1.11)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 22:11:31 +0000
Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca [147.11.189.40])	by mail.windriver.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id pAMMBVqf013258	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL)	for <gdb@sourceware.org>; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 14:11:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ALA-MBB.corp.ad.wrs.com ([169.254.2.78]) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com ([147.11.189.40]) with mapi id 14.01.0255.000; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 14:11:31 -0800
From: "Hashemian, Mehdi" <Mehdi.Hashemian@windriver.com>
To: "gdb@sourceware.org" <gdb@sourceware.org>
Subject: vmcore+bt
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 22:11:00 -0000
Message-ID: <9C7D1FA5BE802245A8F3C35510CCDF1E1FA063F2@ALA-MBB.corp.ad.wrs.com>
References: <9C7D1FA5BE802245A8F3C35510CCDF1E1FA063B3@ALA-MBB.corp.ad.wrs.com>
In-Reply-To: <9C7D1FA5BE802245A8F3C35510CCDF1E1FA063B3@ALA-MBB.corp.ad.wrs.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg00104.txt.bz2

I apologize if this is a repeated question or not the right email list for =
my question:

I am trying to get back-trace information for a kernel module from a vmcore=
 file and seeing different behaviors with gdb 7.1.34 and 7.3. I do add-symb=
ol-file in both cases. With 7.3, I get an error message: "can't read symbol=
s: File format not recognized." and with 7.0, I get only one line of bt inf=
ormation. Is there an outstanding bug for 7.3? What else I am missing to se=
e the complete back-trace?

Regard,
Mehdi