public inbox for gdb@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com>
To: "Denio, Mike" <miked@ti.com>, "gdb@sourceware.org" <gdb@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: Step causes GDB to spin in infinite loop when PC doesn't change
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2022 17:46:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9f853649-6b9b-7ca0-b3e1-6c08c9c5757a@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e5f5e8af573f4b368954636f9d77084c@ti.com>

On 3/18/22 17:33, Denio, Mike wrote:
>>>>>
> That's what the step/next commands are designed to do. GDB will keep
> stepping until it sees a line change. I suppose a "continue" command
> here would be more appropriate, as GDB will send it once and keep
> waiting for the outcome. stepi/nexti would be undesirable given they
> will stop after a single instruction.
> <<<<
> 
> Thanks that makes some level of sense. Stepi also works fine. It just seemed a little odd that the desired behavior would be to lock up GDB if a user accidentally did a "step" on a jump to $ instruction. You can't even get out with ^C. I had to kill the debug server to regain control of GDB.

I recall we used to have some issues like that, where GDB wouldn't stop 
stepping and would give you enough time to ctrl-C your way out of it, 
but they were fixed as far as I recall.

Are you using non-stop mode with synchronous commands? You might want to 
try sending asynchronous commands (passing &), that way GDB will give 
you the prompt instantly and you will have full control again. You can 
then issue an interruption (interrupt -a) to stop everything.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-18 17:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-18 17:33 Denio, Mike
2022-03-18 17:46 ` Luis Machado [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-03-18 17:57 Denio, Mike
2022-03-18 18:39 ` Pedro Alves
     [not found] ` <928a31c6f548411084f4a30dff48e1fe@ti.com>
2022-03-18 20:57   ` Denio, Mike
2022-03-18 16:33 Denio, Mike
2022-03-18 17:28 ` Luis Machado

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9f853649-6b9b-7ca0-b3e1-6c08c9c5757a@arm.com \
    --to=luis.machado@arm.com \
    --cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
    --cc=miked@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).