From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21057 invoked by alias); 16 Aug 2010 21:30:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 21046 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Aug 2010 21:30:04 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-ey0-f169.google.com (HELO mail-ey0-f169.google.com) (209.85.215.169) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 21:29:59 +0000 Received: by eyg7 with SMTP id 7so1880309eyg.0 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 14:29:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.72.84 with SMTP id s62mr4808804wed.107.1281994196650; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 14:29:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.170.147 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 14:29:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20100728175011.GB7907@adacore.com> <201007281902.02965.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20100728220201.GG7907@adacore.com> <201007291514.01249.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20100816151513.GA13566@adacore.com> Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 21:30:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: GDB 7.2 release date From: Mathew Yeates To: Tom Tromey Cc: Joel Brobecker , Pedro Alves , gdb@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-08/txt/msg00106.txt.bz2 I don't crash anymore after the patch. On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "Mathew" =3D=3D Mathew Yeates writes: > > Mathew> I'm confused. At the end of the post Randy says he can't print the > Mathew> variable "str". > Mathew> ----- > Mathew> (gdb) p str1 > Mathew> $1 =3D (REF TO -> ( character*16 )) @0x0: > Mathew> --------------- > > Mathew> But, I'll try it if you think it will work > > I think it will stop gdb from crashing. =A0I think this would be an > improvement over the current situation. > > The 'str' thing may be a separate bug. =A0I haven't looked at that. > > That PR concerns ifort, not gfortran, which IIRC is what you are using. > So it might be the case that this fix is all that you need. =A0Or, it may > be that this patch doesn't help you for some reason as yet unknown to > us. =A0That is what I would like to know. > > Tom >