From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-37645-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 15878 invoked by alias); 8 Jul 2010 04:47:13 -0000
Received: (qmail 15861 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Jul 2010 04:47:11 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-px0-f169.google.com (HELO mail-px0-f169.google.com) (209.85.212.169)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Jul 2010 04:47:06 +0000
Received: by pxi7 with SMTP id 7so405623pxi.0        for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 07 Jul 2010 21:47:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.142.225.8 with SMTP id x8mr8985877wfg.289.1278564424937; Wed, 	07 Jul 2010 21:47:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.142.231.8 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Jul 2010 21:47:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <201007071230.o67CUZYU029252@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com>
References: <201007062128.o66LSkNC032580@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl>	<201007071230.o67CUZYU029252@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2010 04:47:00 -0000
Message-ID: <AANLkTinRIYO2IXHLURvL8oii1nOMmKZgnqy-aImyXHYN@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: support biarch gcore?
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
To: Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>, jan.kratochvil@redhat.com, Jon.Zhou@jdsu.com, 	gdb@sourceware.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-07/txt/msg00027.txt.bz2

On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 5:30 AM, Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> > Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 22:48:44 +0200 (CEST)
>> > From: "Ulrich Weigand" <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
>> >
>> > Unfortunately, it also turned out that the section sizes provided for
>> > .reg in those targets that have gdbarch_core_regset_sections, while
>> > currently unused, were also nearly all wrong ...
>> >
>> > The following patch fixes those sizes, and changes linux-nat.c to
>> > use them.
>
>> Although I don't feel qualified to judge the powerpc bits, this makes
>> quite a bit of sense to me. =A0And yes, the value for amd64-linux is
>> obviously wrong.
>
> OK, thanks!
>
> I've checked the patch in now.
>

Does this fix

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D11467

You can verify it with the testcase in

http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2010-04/msg00425.html



--=20
H.J.