From: Paul Schlie <schlie@comcast.net>
To: Bob Rossi <bob@brasko.net>
Cc: <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: GDB/MI Output Syntax
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 01:36:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BE02002D.8814%schlie@comcast.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050106011036.GA27670@white>
Understood.
> I understand your point here. Here's the state of affair's as far as I
> see it
>
> I want to write a curses based front end to GDB. I looked at the
> alternatives for communicating with GDB and found that MI was the
> documented way to do this. So, with that in mind I started to look for a
> parser and grammar and none were found. This frustrated me cause i
> didn't want to write one, so I suggested GDB output XML. Everyone
> hated this idea. So, I decided to write the parser that everyone else
> could use from here on out, so no one would have to reinvent the wheel.
>
> I've already put some effort into the MI and this is the point that I'm
> currently at. The goal I'm shooting for is to use this parser to really
> validate the output of the MI. Better than is being done know. Make sure
> the syntax and the semantics are perfect.
>
> Basically, I'm not looking into writing a whole new frame work for
> communicating with GDB, I just want to improve what's already there.
>
> Thanks,
> Bob Rossi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-06 1:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-06 0:28 Paul Schlie
2005-01-06 0:32 ` Kip Macy
2005-01-06 0:49 ` Paul Schlie
2005-01-06 1:10 ` Bob Rossi
2005-01-06 1:36 ` Paul Schlie [this message]
[not found] <1093622671.2836.ezmlm@sources.redhat.com>
2004-08-27 17:56 ` Jim Ingham
2004-08-27 19:12 ` Michael Chastain
2005-01-05 23:27 ` Bob Rossi
2005-01-06 4:48 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-01-06 23:31 ` Bob Rossi
2005-01-07 0:36 ` Jim Ingham
2005-01-07 1:12 ` Bob Rossi
2005-01-07 3:12 ` Russell Shaw
2005-01-11 19:35 ` Bob Rossi
2005-01-13 2:23 ` Bob Rossi
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-08-25 15:44 Bob Rossi
2004-08-25 15:57 ` Michael Chastain
2004-08-25 19:37 ` Bob Rossi
2004-08-26 14:01 ` Michael Chastain
2004-08-26 18:31 ` Bob Rossi
2004-08-26 20:44 ` Michael Chastain
2004-08-26 20:52 ` Keith Seitz
2004-08-26 22:16 ` Michael Chastain
2004-08-26 22:03 ` Bob Rossi
2004-08-26 23:06 ` Michael Chastain
2004-08-26 21:13 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-08-26 21:25 ` Bob Rossi
2004-08-26 22:46 ` Michael Chastain
2004-08-27 10:14 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-08-26 22:41 ` Michael Chastain
2004-08-24 3:12 Bob Rossi
2004-08-24 4:15 ` Michael Chastain
2004-08-24 12:30 ` Bob Rossi
2004-08-24 12:50 ` Michael Chastain
2004-08-24 18:59 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-08-24 19:07 ` Bob Rossi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BE02002D.8814%schlie@comcast.net \
--to=schlie@comcast.net \
--cc=bob@brasko.net \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).