From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22591 invoked by alias); 21 May 2005 16:22:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 22540 invoked from network); 21 May 2005 16:21:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO sccrmhc12.comcast.net) (204.127.202.56) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 21 May 2005 16:21:57 -0000 Received: from [10.0.1.2] (c-24-61-199-96.hsd1.nh.comcast.net[24.61.199.96]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with SMTP id <2005052116215701200bakjje>; Sat, 21 May 2005 16:21:57 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.1.0.040913 Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 16:22:00 -0000 Subject: Re: [discuss] Support for reverse-execution (related efficiency issues) From: Paul Schlie To: CC: Steven Johnson Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg00271.txt.bz2 While although not seemingly related, issues raised like: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/2005-05/msg00178.html likely also need to be considered, they can materially effect the relative efficiency of any basis of such a capability.