From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qk1-x72c.google.com (mail-qk1-x72c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72c]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B096D386F00E for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 02:40:59 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org B096D386F00E Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=brasko.net Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=bob@brasko.net Received: by mail-qk1-x72c.google.com with SMTP id 19so7519654qkh.3 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 18:40:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=brasko-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=LwMDChOpQtVXjQS0ApJk2cDfJATVufzPBtJoxbKnITM=; b=NCvB54KQfjnbiWdtuhCyi5xlacPUNvUEdc19Rhjn4Y8qV8FwJCf7U2VvEP3Te2U1Hz EfNWHWs0DfDfnf6G0Sn2QfHLDEBOulpmutqbGrtGM8Q4I5khRkIHPhwtGI3XFSN1S6/f nDMDlyHYqvB4huDWioZpOct2juhyVweXKiq82gjnkKF3xhG8qCsx0Y1ieBO4+WywErOA q13hRVo+WWrnajvazpeBaqRz4iLeiVbJpDcHuvA4tQPZ/2Mh1Ekp2ZnKZx/eEMIlzZ0B fk+USbQWilSJFiEM1e3HFicgvUiD5h290CclURqeYhHhp1v4xC0Vdz3Y9SCfy/Yjit6U 8g3Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=LwMDChOpQtVXjQS0ApJk2cDfJATVufzPBtJoxbKnITM=; b=piMc4rkSbebNW/1CxddhFe7vbq74JTmshz4E6CrVlSUFH7N6jQb9s2FfC+XLmaR3hp JN6odh5HssKeFfkaGFK/syCns3M9RfMGa5Xr+vnXdbzwa1PG+tTk4yhVzONlWbSAFFbp C7IDdiC4uryPUMRkaqaQXUKpDbXfSlmrbqRlRvpqXG3A1pDTNHdzu2z/n0pR8uS1UexV f9XTRv+L+UrX18P3vD9mP3KBQ9Hb7u/hc/fq9suK6aQ1bs6wx+46j/T8tUwU3XQUUMyW BVMm1Itjlv0mJjRpZfJ5BwxKcDv1c3gtbEumBTJ1REmJ81Qzhskj148Xn4+kpuykpFcX +opA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532WsAvkugaj0lborZ1PgjXCSnYGetGcyO+5jTHiK0Go+G41nsJD b5zW9RKFCc2fqRyjxndWCtDh+HqLHpVbgGWVCJwoSSjz5HHnefBn X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxCzUD04A1nkZI6DTFUP3VRkxYG3Cm19cGrNsWbxW9q3NJfvWrHaBek5eHrUkY/trqqbqeByuWkvqRKukirj1w= X-Received: by 2002:a37:be04:: with SMTP id o4mr2359945qkf.373.1611888058807; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 18:40:58 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210120033156.GA22914@xubuntu.brasko.net> In-Reply-To: <20210120033156.GA22914@xubuntu.brasko.net> From: Robert Rossi Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 21:40:47 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: MI and the prompt To: GDB Development Cc: Pedro Alves X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 02:41:01 -0000 For the record, my testing shows that this issue does not occur when using the 'new-ui mi' command line flag. On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 10:31 PM Bob Rossi wrote: > Hi, > > I long time ago I asked the GDB mailing list how to determine if GDB is > ready > for another command when using MI. Pedro Alves wrote: > > GDB is ready for input when it prints the MI prompt. There's one > prompt that is already printed after ^running that you should ignore. > That's an historical wart. > > I recently started to update cgdb to drop annotations and use the new-ui > command line option. I noticed that i'm no longer seeing that historical > wart. > > Has this been "fixed" in gdb? If so, is there a way to determine which > versions of gdb have the historical wart, and which ones do not? > > Thanks, > Bob Rossi > >