From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23971 invoked by alias); 15 Aug 2012 18:02:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 23938 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Aug 2012 18:02:26 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-ob0-f169.google.com (HELO mail-ob0-f169.google.com) (209.85.214.169) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 18:02:12 +0000 Received: by obhx4 with SMTP id x4so2861083obh.0 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 11:02:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.20.234 with SMTP id q10mr2694716oee.107.1345053731335; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 11:02:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.143.201 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 11:02:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <877gt0ujmn.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> References: <20120812200427.GA12561@google.com> <502B93BF.6020802@google.com> <502B94C9.4020607@google.com> <877gt0ujmn.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 18:02:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Merge C++ conversion into trunk (0/6 - Overview) From: Gabriel Dos Reis To: Tom Tromey Cc: Diego Novillo , Richard Guenther , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Lawrence Crowl , bonzini@gnu.org, dj@redhat.com, laurynas.biveinis@gmail.com, gdb@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-08/txt/msg00056.txt.bz2 On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "Diego" == Diego Novillo writes: > > Diego> GDB folks, would it be hard to figure out that there is a single > Diego> variant of the called function and trust the user that they are > Diego> passing the right pointer value? > > I asked Keith to resurrect his patch for this. Since people are concerned about typing rules, would it be an option for GDB to allow people to input pointer literals with the "p" suffix (or "0p" prefix instead of "0x")? -- Gaby