From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-47168-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 97904 invoked by alias); 26 Aug 2019 10:22:31 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 97894 invoked by uid 89); 26 Aug 2019 10:22:31 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=HX-Languages-Length:486, HX-Received:a6b, H*i:sk:8736hoq, H*f:sk:8736hoq
X-HELO: mail-io1-f44.google.com
Received: from mail-io1-f44.google.com (HELO mail-io1-f44.google.com) (209.85.166.44) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 10:22:30 +0000
Received: by mail-io1-f44.google.com with SMTP id z3so36056033iog.0        for <gdb@sourceware.org>; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 03:22:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;        h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to         :cc;        bh=5AGvffvf1u5Z9J2Tn0JZy1Ofqg6sYj52oZuTEjD/6qw=;        b=ki1ZymnxWAGZ3jjYgcFqjf2Ch2jKnb/iUXqTpHv7ZrJcxgIQdVW2XPdyFsoP1sbZoH         nPctU7ItCEJk646h/xVgEyT0X/s7Kh9O3evpIlSq6N+LyN2rxKRVh0ImocauJNZvTxaZ         TJZmCUwpn1zivs8Bec5g24GqzfSlet/UMvz9N1h/Slm3seRfJOPFPvP5Hh54YosrLZD/         zPzY2fE8jVR/rDxNtGAeNhA2qn5nJQVp5nwjF0TgGE0bcUSIAxnF4climvxKts+d8yua         PSpN13QCB1WmtFS4FOywDfd4r2cPOfUMRn+TYwH8hHwNcNnLf5UYuqBNghgLF6EHpTj+         nLdQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CACMsj9PVtSb_+1gYAUaQPafUd0A-PDuQT5UpvVUWmOHExzxb=w@mail.gmail.com> <8736hoquwb.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <8736hoquwb.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com>
From: Andrea Cardaci <cyrus.and@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 10:22:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CACMsj9NszJ93cbUguboD_J18849kTTer6JbJFdCv8MwSc3q22w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Function address incoherence
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb@sourceware.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-SW-Source: 2019-08/txt/msg00039.txt.bz2

On Mon, 26 Aug 2019 at 08:54, Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> wrote:

> Please not the -0x83c0 offset.  The symbol information is not really helpful, probably due to missing debugging information.

How can GDB then come up with _start then?

> Both the main program and the dynamic loader have a _start symbol.

How can I figure out that the dynamic loader have a _start symbol?
AFAIK there is none, I've checked with objdump, readelf, radare, etc.