From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-47174-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 124654 invoked by alias); 26 Aug 2019 17:39:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 124645 invoked by uid 89); 26 Aug 2019 17:39:02 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=H*f:sk:CACMsj9, H*i:sk:CACMsj9, H*f:sk:rZNCboO, H*i:sk:rZNCboO
X-HELO: mail-io1-f52.google.com
Received: from mail-io1-f52.google.com (HELO mail-io1-f52.google.com) (209.85.166.52) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 17:39:01 +0000
Received: by mail-io1-f52.google.com with SMTP id o9so39290453iom.3        for <gdb@sourceware.org>; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 10:39:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;        h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to         :cc;        bh=RCY7YBBoZjqgKhlzrp6RMiAHryNDfRpjrnGbXt27NSo=;        b=EXjxWHYzAScm8YHQFU6rAeGsJ2308N/XeBEIwDI18WEuM7R20TkKD4PUhuEz8t4mnm         J+AXlTfQuwd4TUlE2nVij/AqBcNity9rzOxmlPwCXWLr1e3uU9YZ4Hm3xFuKQlG9n9LC         JyI4k0zBl4OfaZ49/rpSjozWYi1fQhs4EFC21DlcqsdN7BNFmB/8A/S5lmhJY42v8BBC         s5++7M+typhUm02rFLuG8Z5w6xMIE0CF0j4FvxhWil9qHmY79706pCFpnmwirE4xuuaK         +D8P4CkoUx029jEbXp6FWYOHnr4+iXUF25SOsue+2/GRX1bsBbht9iQONlmKJmfMBaOt         bqAA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CACMsj9PVtSb_+1gYAUaQPafUd0A-PDuQT5UpvVUWmOHExzxb=w@mail.gmail.com> <CAPTJ0XH=GzX4+xR_OiVcc=+r2socS0uJuF6zoNcR6=Ux+ULSbw@mail.gmail.com> <CACMsj9Nb5LsRdAXhfOH=rZNCboORhwqChCRu730-SA4MEjtr-Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACMsj9Nb5LsRdAXhfOH=rZNCboORhwqChCRu730-SA4MEjtr-Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andrea Cardaci <cyrus.and@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 17:39:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CACMsj9O43DZDLaFpS13N5d19f51Fo5SNt=ywjVozfHj1ShH_7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Function address incoherence
To: Christian Biesinger <cbiesinger@google.com>
Cc: gdb@sourceware.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-SW-Source: 2019-08/txt/msg00045.txt.bz2

On Mon, 26 Aug 2019 at 18:50, Andrea Cardaci <cyrus.and@gmail.com> wrote:

> This actually seems a good idea and I can't remember why I didn't end
> up using that, let me try...

Right, GDB does not always return symbol information, for example, in
the original use case frame.function() is None, yet GDB knows the
current function and its boundaries (according to disassemble and
print $pc).