From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-41129-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 28027 invoked by alias); 11 Jul 2012 21:52:52 -0000
Received: (qmail 28018 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Jul 2012 21:52:51 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.5 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-vc0-f169.google.com (HELO mail-vc0-f169.google.com) (209.85.220.169)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 21:52:39 +0000
Received: by vcbfl10 with SMTP id fl10so1350501vcb.0        for <gdb@sourceware.org>; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 14:52:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=google.com; s=20120113;        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to         :cc:content-type:x-system-of-record:x-gm-message-state;        bh=uHqQLbUn3X0RgxSSts9uIZvyPgISKZpGWovt1v5OX4o=;        b=aDIYQ5OQkIVt3d/rUZy3z5zv/mdgS3HVzRxC894qC4tqU0rUJgN3ojY9AQQx/TIDt1         LgUS9CC2tx+rAvz5VwGzRTCj5kIjvFMKgrgYiWkNB48ekofHu8q+bi+9evcl9M/64tOJ         QKb4U7aIjUmaqryOS0Z8LDPXqNXBea+UChLeWijv0L2n/YjkP2cM4Lisj37vQrlKpfy8         q+ppv37TqgEzeLEGGaRtxblvjGjYslFjjAawAaZBe6lCBfNKIc50/uGVpToDvtbtbKQa         E+qj9LuFovXww9gceD8X+4ypwKMJ/2aD9LMKsw4DBEo4GUvYCo5o5z1mF9/C9uXXHxfN         FRSg==
Received: by 10.52.30.2 with SMTP id o2mr20285792vdh.132.1342043558653;        Wed, 11 Jul 2012 14:52:38 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.30.2 with SMTP id o2mr20285786vdh.132.1342043558550; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 14:52:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.34.45 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 14:52:38 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <y0mipdu6kyf.fsf@fche.csb>
References: <4FFC2F18.9000708@tu-dresden.de>	<y0mipdu6kyf.fsf@fche.csb>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 21:52:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CADPb22R9o3MWmXKxZnO4-OKXZwPZjGVKGqL7nxiLdMxFj13hFA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Licencing policy for gdb Python plugins
From: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>
Cc: Joachim Protze <joachim.protze@tu-dresden.de>, gdb@sourceware.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-System-Of-Record: true
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmQO+yxwr+fZYLKMRuy8/2vvRN6D8jJiTmGG12BWG2XL79JKzzIBXGhy3kA06ZP1Lllga3I1zmxqiRLDrJ/HcI1HRCa+9UXRN/5Tzo2/XFwBN88gnpLRxElhJKXOMMhDc63CXX2szP3WLJKR6R4sAmFPKTe7q1kWApJy7UKSaMMOHsWKjFo73NA46OhFFnlsuHY3HvP
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-07/txt/msg00030.txt.bz2

On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Frank Ch. Eigler <fche@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Joachim Protze <joachim.protze@tu-dresden.de> writes:
>
>> [...]  while the discussion in the last session of the GNU cauldron,
>> the question raised, whether there is a licencing policy for Python
>> plugins, [...]
>
> Unless one believes the gdb plugin api is copyrightable in its own
> right (and thus license compatibility comes up), perhaps discussion
> should be limited to how the gdb project would accept said plugins as
> a contribution.

Hi.
Yeah, I'm not sure how else to interpret the discussion.